
11:00 Sat 12 Jan 2008 REF: KSAMMDD1
DATE: Fri 11 Jan 2008 TIME: PLAN 17:30-18:30
ACTUAL 17:30-18:30
VENUE: Mosman RSC ATTENDEES:
MOSMAN 2088 Pim RAVESTJIN [WPR]
Ivan BAHNIK [IGB]
Bill HOSKINS [WRH]
Michael CLEAR [MJC]
Peter AXTENS [PMA]
AGENDA Stephen GOULD [SGG]
A Confirm draft record
B No confirmation from Pittwater Council
C Review Letter Mosman General Manager re Child Protection
E Review Plan 2008 Work Group Reports
F Follow-up SHOROC Kimbriki Company plan
G Other Councils & CDSE Applications
H MOSMAN COUNCIL CONTACT DETAILS WEBSITE
I LETTER FROM MOSMAN MAYOR RE CODE OF PRACTICE
X OIC IE Event Credit System
Z Next Steps - Agenda Action Meet 2 17:30 Fri 18 Jan 2008
A CONFIRM DRAFT RECORD - No changes
KSAS-2088 has established a Carbon-Offsets project team to understand
the issues involved with Carbon offsets for Playing Field Floodlights
and Parents' travel offsets to training & games.
All Meeting Agreed important reason and to include the OIC
Management Volunteer Credit Accounting as part of the Committee
Management Process
All Proposed extension scope agreed - thanks to Adelle, Colin and
Tim for new web-site for Sustainability issues
http://www.ksas-au.net/SAN
B REVIEW RESPONSE PITTWATER COUNCIL MEETING
SGG AS AT 17:00 FRI 04 JAN 2008 NO RESPONSE FROM PITTWATER COUNCIL
SGG We attended the Pittwater Council meeting on Mon 17 Dec 2007 to ask
a question about whether Pittwater Council Policy was the same as
the Manly and Mosman Council Policy on the Child Protection issue.
The response from the General Manager Mark FERGUSON was "Pittwater
is discussing a number of Sporting Initiatives with Manly and
Warringah Councils".
An email was sent to the General manager requesting him to confirm
our understanding of his response.
A response had not been received and as 12:00 Fri 28 Dec 2007
the minutes had not been posted on the Council Website
C REVIEW LTR MOSMAN GENERAL MANAGER RE CHILD PROTECTION
SGG Further to the KSAS-2088 meeting 14 Dec 2007 a draft Letter has
been prepared
This letter compared the correspondence from the NSW Minister
for Sport and the NSW Local Government Association with the
letter received from the Mosman General Manager.
Both letters from the Minister and the NSWLGA confirmed that
the Council was responsible for Duty of Care issues on Child
Protection
The meeting agreed that the letter was suitable and should be sent
on Mon 31 Dec 2007.
D PRESENTATION TO COUNCILS
SGG A web-presentation for Councils to understand the Child Protection
concerns and how the "Junior Sports Information Service [JSIS]"
and "Kids Safe-at-Sport [KSAS-Au]" have been developed to address
the concerns.
This can be reviewed on Presentation for Councils
E REVIEW PLAN 2008 WORK GROUP REPORTS
a Link exercise equipment to generators
Chair MJC Notary WRH
Obj: To Research if bicycles linked to Generators before
NxS: Report Meet 2 M 2007/12/03
MJC 1 Confirmed worked successfully many times before.
2 Bank of 6, 12 and 24 cycles for pilot to gauge electricity
3 Suggest involve local Police/Youth Clubs so equipment secure
b Carbon Offset Electricity RECs records
Chair PMA Notary SGG
Obj: To record how RECS will be records & updated
NxS: Report Meet 2 M 2007/12/03
PMA 1 Proposed Mosman RECs registry could be on Mosman RSC web-site
so that a Mosman RSC Committee can verify the Records are
accurate
2 If REC sites at schools, council, gyms and police clubs then
there would be secure sites
3 Log on facility based on home property number
c "Mosman Money" as part of Local Information Economy
Chair SGG Notary MJC
Obj: To record how Volunteer Credits can be accrued
NxS: Report Meet 4 M 2007/12/10
SGG 1 Discussed with Mosman RSC Director
2 Detail to be included in CDSE submission
d Organise 12 events at Mosman RSC
Chair WRH (A) Notary PMA
Obj: To propose dates 12 events
NxS: Report Meet 4 M 2007/12/10
D PROPOSED DATES FOR SEMINARS
Proposed Dates: Jan Thu 24 Jan 2008 19:00 - 20:00
Feb Thu 21 Feb 2008 19:00 - 20:00
Mar Thu 20 Mar 2008 19:00 - 20:00
Apr Thu 24 Apr 2008 19:00 - 20:00
May Thu 22 May 2008 19:00 - 20:00
Jun Thu 19 Jun 2008 19:00 - 20:00
Jul Thu 24 Jul 2008 19:00 - 20:00
Aug Thu 21 Aug 2008 19:00 - 20:00
Sep Thu 25 Sep 2008 19:00 - 20:00
Oct Thu 23 Oct 2008 19:00 - 20:00
Nov Thu 20 Nov 2008 19:00 - 20:00
Dec Thu 18 Dec 2008 19:00 - 20:00
Dates appear to be OK - email Mosman RSC to see if rooms
are available
F FOLLOW-UP SHOROC KIMBRIKI COMPANY PLAN
This is a summary of issues discussed on the possible reasons
behind why "Inventing The Australian Model of Government" Seminars
were sponsored by Andersen Consulting in 1993.
This new Model of Government appears to be based on the use of Electronic
Share trading and "Market Based Instruments [MBIs] for all natural
Resources" ref Tender Dep Agriculture Tender 20 Jan 2006
These concerns were not dispelled by the press article 23 Jan 2008 that
a former NSW Premier was appointed Director of a Company in 2006
and subsequently sold the shares 12 months later for $ 16,000,000.
There are concerns that many Local Government Councillors are aware
of the "Inventing the Australian Model of Government" policy with
the justification of Share Trading as a natural "entitlement" for
Councillors.
eg proposed Kimbriki Council Company with 51% Shares controlled by
the Administrator of Warringah Council.
SGG explained that between 1991-1993 he was involved with Paul
JENKINS in trying to establish "Computer Camps for Disadvantaged
Children" at a number of UK Universities during the 10 wk UK Summer
Holidays.
There are been a number of meetings with different Universities
including Liverpool University, Liverpool Polytechnic and the
Liverpool Council Education Committee.
The Archbishop of Liverpool and the Bishop of Liverpool via Canon
David WOODHOUSE were both very supportive but several members of
the Education Committee refused to meet to discuss the Computer
Camps and the Liverpool Council Education Policy.
Later that year 1992 Peter JONES [PJ] at the London School of
Economics and Political Science [LSE] explained the importance of
Education Policy and how Share Trading and Share Capital was used
to by-pass Financial Regulations
A 1533 Religion and Education Policy
B 1651 The First Commonwealth
C 1670 The East India Company
D 1688 The Glorious Revolution
E 1692 Subduing the Scots
F 1694 Scotland and the Darien Expedition
G 1707 Scotland and the Union of Parliaments
H 1720 South Sea Bubble Act
I 1812 Saving the English Stockmarket from Bankruptcy
J 1989 State Owned Corporations [SoC] Act
K 1993 Local Government Act
L 2000 Electronic Transaction Act and the new Economics
1 1533 Religion and Education Policy
PJ explained that while many people believed that Henry VIII established
the Church of England in 1533 so that he could obtain a divorce from
Catherine of Aragon (Spain) there were indeed several other reasons.
In fact many people consider the main reason why Henry VIII set up
the Church of England was because the Roman Catholic Church owned
much of the Land and levied high charges on the local population
for weddings, christenings and funerals, to fund their exclusive
rights for educating the masses.
There was one child, Mary I (TUDOR), from the first Marriage of Henry
VIII and she was brought up as a staunch Roman Catholic.
Henry VIII then married Anne BOLEYN and had a daughter Elizabeth I
who was brought up as a Church of England Protestant
Henry VIII's third wife Jane SEYMOUR produced a male heir Edward VI
who was also brought up as a Church of England Protestant.
Edward VI ruled as a Church of England Protestant for 6 years until
he died in 1553.
Edward was succeeded by his half-sister Mary I who ruled as a Catholic
Queen for 5 years.
Elizabeth I succeeded Mary as a Church of England Protestant Queen
from 1558 - 1603 (45 years)
Thus Religion had an enormous impact on Education Policy in the
Middle Ages.
After Elizabeth died this bought about the Treaty of Crowns between
England and Scotland when James VI of Scotland became James I of
England.
As Elizabeth was childless the succession passed to the male
heirs of Henry VIII's elder sister Margaret TUDOR.
James I of England although a Church of England Protestant was
succeeded in 1625 by his son Charles I who had married a Catholic
Princess.
Charles I famously engaged in a struggle for power with the
Parliament of England.
He was an advocate of the Divine Right of Kings, and many in England
feared that he was attempting to gain absolute power.
Many of his actions, particularly the levying of taxes without
Parliament's consent, caused widespread opposition.
1651 The First Commonwealth
In 1642 Oliver CROMWELL started a series of conflicts known as the
English Civil War (1642-1651)which left to the ousting of the
Monarchy and the first Commonwealth of England.
In 1656 the Jews of Amsterdam approached Oliver CROMWELL as the
Lord Protector to be allowed to return to England after 300
years banishment when Edward I (Longshanks) had banned usury
in England in 1290
CROMWELL would not allow the Jews to return hence the Portuguese
Jews (these are the people that established the School of
Navigation at Sagres in Portugal for Henry the Navigator) funded
the return of Charles II.
The School of Navigation was based on the work of Abraham Cresques, a
Jewish cartographer of Majorca who was succeeded in this profession
by his son Jefuda.
By 1375 Abraham Cresques had drawn a beautiful mappamundi of 12
folding leaves that is customarily called "the Catalan Atlas".
Hence that is why Portugal is England's oldest ally and why Rear
Admiral Phillips, who led the First Fleet to Australia, was seconded
to the Portugese Navy for 3 years.
Rear-Admiral PHILLIPS stopped at Rio-de Janeiro with the First Fleet
for one month where he met with the Portuguese Royal Family who were
based in Brazil rather than Portugal.
"Rats and parasites such as bedbugs, lice, cockroaches and fleas,
tormented the convicts and because of this on 5 August the fleet
reached Rio de Janeiro and stayed for a month.
The ships were cleaned and water taken on board, repairs were made,
and Phillip ordered large quantities of food for the fleet.
The women convicts’ clothing, which had become infested with lice,
was burned, and the women were issued with new clothes made from
rice sacks.
The fleet left Rio on 3 September this was the last port of call, so
the main task was to stock up on plants, seeds and livestock for their
arrival in Australia".
(ref former British Ambassador Sir Roger CARRICK 26 Jan 2007 at
the Australian-Britain Society, attended by the NSW Governor General
Professor Marie BASHIR.)
1670 The East India Company
From around 1680 the East India Company formed the backbone of the
English wealth from International Trade
By a series of five acts around 1670, King Charles II provisioned it
with the rights to autonomous territorial acquisitions, to mint money,
to command fortresses and troops and form alliances, to make war and
peace, and to exercise both civil and criminal jurisdiction over the
acquired areas.
By 1689, the Company was arguably a "nation" in the Indian mainland,
independently administering the vast presidencies of Bengal, Madras and
Bombay and possessing a formidable and intimidating military strength.
From 1698 the company was entitled to use the motto "Auspicio Regis et
Senatus Angliae" meaning,"Under the patronage of the King and Parliament
of England".
1688 The Glorious Revolution
In 1688 Parliament invited Mary Stuart and her husband WILLIAM of Orange
to become co-Monarchs of England
The Glorious Revolution was when William of Orange from Holland took the
English throne from James II in 1688.
"The event brought a permanent realignment of power within the English
constitution.
The new co-monarchy of King William III and Queen Mary II accepted more
constraints from Parliament than previous monarchs had, and the new
constitution created the expectation that future monarchs would also
remain constrained by Parliament.
The new balance of power between parliament and crown made the promises
of the English government more credible, and credibility allowed the
government to reorganize its finances through a collection of changes
called 'The Financial Revolution'.
A more contentious argument is that the constitutional changes made
property rights more secure and thus promoted economic development."
1692 Massacre at Glencoe
In the meantime the Scots were a perpetual thorn in the side of
Parliament.
"As early as 1690, Lord Tarbet, (subsequently Earl of Cromarty,)
proposed a scheme for the quieting of the Highlands, which Lord
Breadalbane offered to carry into execution; but it was at the
time abandoned.
In 1691, however, negotiations were again renewed, and, as has
been seen, Breadalbane was intrusted with a sum of money to
distribute among the chiefs, or rather to buy up the claims which
Argyle and other superiors had over their feudal vassals, and which
was the real cause of the strife and dissatisfaction existing in
the Highlands.
The Secretary of state, Sir John Dalrymple, known as the Master of
Stair, son of the Earl of Stair, appears latterly to have been at
the bottom of the scheme, and was certainly most anxious that it
should be successfully and speedily carried out, having at first
apparently no thought of resorting to measures of cruel severity.
As the chiefs did not seem in any hurry to come to terms, a
proclamation was issued, in August 1691, requiring them to take
the oath of allegiance before the 1st. of January 1692, threatening
all those who did not comply with "letters of fire and sword."
This had the proper effect, as, one by one, the chiefs swore fealty
to the government, Macdonald of Glencoe, from pride or some other
reason, being the last to comply with the terms of the proclamation.
The difficulty in getting the chiefs to come to terms and thus
allowing the government to pursue its other schemes without anxiety,
seems at last to have irritated Sir John Dalrymple so much against
them, that latterly he eagerly desired that some, and especially the
various tribes of Macdonalds, might hold out beyond the time, in
order that an example might be made of them by putting into execution
the penalty attached to the non-fulfilment of the terms of the
proclamation."
The Massacre at Glencoe
1698 The Darien Expedition
Bearing in mind the background to the massacre at Glencoe othermeans
had to be devised to subdue the Scots.
This was a disastrous attempt by Scotland to establish its own
trading company to rival the English East India Company.
The expedition was led by William PATERSON a Scotsman credited with
being the Founder of the Bank of England in 1694
However who sold Paterson the map of the Darien Isthmus and
who supported him in establishing the Bank of England is
very difficult to track down.
The English and the Dutch are alleged to have withdrawn from
funding the Darien Expedition so Paterson issued shares that
could only be purchased by the Scots.
More that 30% of Scotland's entire wealth was used to fund
the Darien Expedition.
When it failed, the Scots were bankrupt and forced to agree
to the Union of Parliaments with England to form the United
Kingdom
1707 Scotland and the Union of Parliaments
The failure of the Darien Expedition led to the Union of
Parliaments
The Scottish perspective
"In Scotland, it was claimed that union would enable Scotland to
recover from the financial disaster wrought by the Darien scheme
through English assistance and the lifting of measures put in
place through the Alien Act to force the Scottish Parliament
into compliance with the Act of Settlement.
The ultimate securing of the treaty in the unicameral Scottish
Parliament is sometimes attributed to the weakness and lack of
cohesion between the various opposition groups in the House,
rather than to the strength of pro-incorporationists.
The combined votes of the Court party with a majority of the
Squadrone Volante were sufficient to ensure the final passage
of the treaty through the House.
Personal financial interests were also involved.
Many Commissioners had invested heavily in the Darien Scheme
and they believed that they would receive compensation for
their losses; Article 14, the Equivalent granted £398,085 10s
sterling to Scotland to offset future liability towards the
English national debt.
In essence, it was also used as a means of compensation for
investors in the Darien Scheme.
Even more direct bribery was said to be a factor.
£20,000 (£240,000 Scots) was dispatched to Scotland for
distribution by the Earl of Glasgow.
James Douglas, 2nd Duke of Queensberry, the Queen's Commissioner
in Parliament, received £12,325, the majority of the funding.
(Other studies suggest that all of this money was properly
accounted for as compensation for loss of office, pensions and so
forth not outwith the usual run of government. It is perhaps a
debate that will never be set to rest.)
Robert Burns referred to this:
We were bought and sold for English Gold,
Sic a Parcel of Rogues in a Nation.
Some of the money was used to hire spies, such as Daniel Defoe;
his first reports were of vivid descriptions of violent
demonstrations against the Union.
"A Scots rabble is the worst of its kind," he reported, "for
every Scot n favour there is 99 against".
Years later John Clerk of Penicuik, originally a leading Unionist,
wrote in his memoirs that, (Defoe) was a spy among us, but not known
as such, otherwise the Mob of Edinburgh would pull him to pieces.
Defoe recalls that he was hired by Robert Harley."
It appears that "Political Bribery and Corruption" has changed
little over the ensuing centuries.
1720 South Sea Bubble Act
How the UK Government funded its debt via the South Sea Bubble Act
"In 1719 the company proposed a scheme by which it would buy more than
half the national debt of Britain (£30,981,712), again with new shares,
and a promise to the government that the debt would be converted to a
lower interest rate, 5% until 1727 and 4% per year thereafter.
The purpose of this conversion was similar to the old one: it would allow
a conversion of high interest, but difficult to trade debt, into low
interest, readily marketable debt/shares of the South Sea Company.
All parties could gain.
For a clarification of the situation the total government debt in 1719
was £50 million:
£18.3m was held by three large corporations:
a £ 3.4m by the Bank of England.
b £ 3.2m by the British East India Company.
c £11.7m by the South Sea Company.
Privately held redeemable debt amounted to £16.5m.
£15m consisted of irredeemable annuities, long fixed-term annuities of
72-87 years and short annuities of 22 years remaining maturity.
The Bank of England proposed a similar competing offer, which did not
prevail when the South Sea raised its bid to £7.5m (plus approximately
£1.3m in bribes).
The proposal was accepted in a slightly altered form in April 1720.
The Chancellor of the Exchequer, John Aislabie, was a strong supporter
of the scheme.
Crucial in this conversion was the proportion of holders of irredeemable
annuities that could be tempted to convert their securities at a high
price for the new shares.
(Holders of redeemable debt had effectively no other choice but to
subscribe.)
The South Sea Company could set the conversion price but could
obviously not diverge a lot from the market price of its shares.
The company ultimately acquired 85% of the redeemables and 80% of the
irredeemables."
The South Sea Bubble company become a form of frenzied Pyramid
Selling as everyone tried to buy shares
Has anything changed in the 21st century with the Telstra Shares ?
It most certainly has, as the Australian Wheat Board [AWB] has
shown with electronic Invoicing to Iraq !
1812 Saving the English Stockmarket from Bankruptcy
The Rothschild Legend includes a Statement that the Rothschilds saved
the English Stockmarket from Bankruptcy in 1812 after the Battle of
Waterloo between Napoleon and the Duke of Wellington.
However Rothschild actually spread a rumour that Wellington lost !
"So, with everyone believing Wellington to be defeated, Rothschild
immediately began to sell all of his stock on the English Stock
Market.
Everyone else followed his lead, and also began selling, causing stocks
to plummet to practically nothing.
At the last minute, his agents secretly began buying up the stocks
at rock-bottom prices.
On June 21, at 11 PM, Wellington's envoy, Major Henry Percy showed up
at the War Office with his report that Napoleon had been crushed in a
bitter eight hour battle, losing a third of his men.
This gave the Rothschild family complete control of the British economy,
and forced England to set up a new Bank of England, which Nathan
Rothschild controlled".
1989 NSW State introduces State Owned Corporations Act
This Act enables the NSW Government to establish Public
Organisations as "State owned Corporations [SoC]" with the
Premier and Ministers as the shareholders.
The Companies can either be
1 "Company SoC" with the Treasurer and 4 other ministers
as shareholders - the Constitution is within the meaning
of the Corporations Act 2001
2 "Statutory SoC" with the Treasurer and 1 other minister
as shareholders - THERE IS NO CONSTITUTION FOR
A STATUTORY SOC - THE WEB PAGES JUST LINK IN A CIRCLE
1993 Local Government Act
The NSW Government changes its Local Government Act so Councils
become Statutory SOCs
2000 NSW Electronic Transaction Act and the new Economics
Each State introduces its own Electronic Transaction Act
Electronic Trading without having to pay staff is born !
In the US over 80% of Stock Market Share Bids are electronic
which has created enormous unemployment for on-floor brokers.
In Australia, some State Organisations Bid electronically every
15 minutes for Electricity.
Eg Central Queensland University Tender 05 Apr 2006
The MBIs {Market Based Instruments} for Natural Resources
like Electricity, Water, Carbon, Sewerage and Volunteers etc
will provide large and regular electronic trading fluctuations.
The Government will receive the GST on each trade.
However who will set the price for Electricity, Carbon, Water,
Sewerage and Volunteers etc ?
Is it the Idependent Pricing and Regulation Tribunal ?
Is this why the NSW State Government is now selling off
the Electricity Companies so that the Government will
no longer be responsible for "Market Forces" ?
G OTHER COUNCILS & CDSE GRANT APPLICATION
a KSAS-2088 Applications for a Community Development and Support
Expenditure Grant [CDSE] to initially fund the awareness campaign
in 2008.
The meeting confirmed 2 separate CDSE Applications
1 Mosman RSC - Technical Feasibility Study
2 Mosman Council - Community Awareness Program
b Another SHOROC council has requested a paper and invited KSAS-Au
to give a presentation to the Council
c Another Sydney Council has invited KSAS-Au to make a submission
for CDSE and Community funds in 2008
H MOSMAN COUNCIL CONTACT DETAILS WEBSITE
AER and CRS had completed the initial Mosman Council Contact Website.
This website would provide a record of the questions asked of each
councillor
I RESPONSE TO MOSMAN MAYOR RE CODE OF PRACTICE 21 DEC 2007
A letter dated Wed 21 Dec 2007 had been received on Fri 23 Dec 2007 from
the Mayor Mosman Council re Mosman Code of Meeting Practice.
The response was agreed by attendes on Fri 11 Jan 2007
X OIC IE EVENT CREDITS SYSTEM - MEET 8
STAGE: PLANNING MEETING 8
Link to Credits Codes
MAT RPT TET ART EAT FET MDT ERT TOTAL
WPR 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 70
IGB 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 70
WRH 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 70
MJC 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 70
PMA 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 70
SGG 40 20 10 10 20 10 40 150
Z NEXT STEPS
DATE: Fri 18 Jan 2008 TIME: 17:30 - 18:30
VENUE: Mosman RSC STAGE: Action Plans
AGENDA WHO
A Review Letter to NSW Minister Local Government WPR/BGH/WRH/CMC/PMA/SGG
B Confirm meeting schedule All
C Review CDSE Applications All
Following meeting
DATE: Fri 25 Jan 2008 TIME: 17:30 - 18:30
VENUE: Mosman RSC
![]()